Given that the benefits are so clear, if your district has not yet adopted a digital solution, there are likely two main reasons.
The first one is legacy thinking and the desire to stick with the status quo. I’ll raise my hand here: Given my longevity and comfort with paper tests, I was initially a holdout. Like many of you may be, I was comfortable flexing my “muscle memory” in administering the paper kits I’d been using my entire career.
While making a change is difficult, among those who took the plunge (including me!), we hear constantly that they would never go back to paper and pencil again. Additionally, as new psychologists enter the field, they will expect the digital tools they’ve trained on to be the norm. I believe that making the switch will put your district at a competitive advantage in attracting top talent.
Aside from process, by far the most common hesitation related to moving to digital assessments is budget. Besides a DALS subscription, many schools need to purchase iPads to take advantage of the Q-interactive platform. It can become a complicated logistical challenge, with multiple people controlling different budgets that all have to be mobilized to make that purchase.
Fortunately, we’ve found many ways to cross that hurdle, even with the spigot of ESSER funds and related money slowing.
First, there are often specific grants designated for mental health and social-emotional learning that can be tapped by digging a little deeper into the library to identify niche screeners that can be woven into them.
The simple, annual price for DALS is based on the most recent number of IEPs reported to the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. However, this number is a proxy for pricing. Districts can use the library to test all students they are legally responsible for, such as those who are in the process of being identified, those who are being assessed for giftedness, and even those who don't attend school in the district but the district may still be responsible for (like charter school students), thereby expanding the possible funding.
By recognizing that the library has a far greater breadth of applicability than just the most well-known tests like the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children® | Fifth Edition (WISC®-V) and Wechsler Individual Achievement Test® | Fourth Edition (WIAT®-4), even more school professionals — including occupational therapists, physical therapists, social workers, reading specialists and more — can make use of it.
Because these tools apply to a significantly wider range of needs, multiple funding sources likely exist across various district budget buckets. That can open up the purse strings to give access to budgets for Multi-Tiered System of Supports Implementation (MTSS) and Response to Intervention (RTI), for example. DALS even offers evaluations for gifted and talented identification. This matrix shows the available assessments by age and the specific need targeted.
Some districts are addressing the budget issue by tallying up what they would have otherwise spent if they had bought assessments a la carte, proving the cost-effectiveness of the library.
Chuck also likes to note the substantial benefit of DALS built-in predictability — in a test release year with increased test kit costs, budgets no longer suffer significant pendulum swings. While costs used to be sporadic, with DALS, there’s now some budget stability the district can count on from year to year. Even better, the unlimited availability gives clinicians the freedom to use any test deemed necessary without worrying about overextending the budget.